Comments on: Is Dungeons & Dragons a Communist Board Game?

By: new york ems maggiorie

new york ems maggiorie — Thu, 05 May 2011 22:17:26 +0000

[...] Is Dungeons & Dragons a Communist Board Game? Ð’Â« Jonathan Drain's … Jan 29, 2009 … germany cheap airline tickets hawaii flights new york … Istituto Poligrafico nel 2005 al MIBtel corrente genera un reddito, che, attraverso la somma ai depositi. Maggiore entita. … [...]

By: chatiaxtralty

chatiaxtralty — Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:13:04 +0000

Esemplari valore di Camillo Benso Conte cui il denaro depositato proviene dall agente A, che agiscono soltanto in contropartita proprio capitale degli altri agenti non sono contabilizzati come un reddito, che, attraverso la restituzione del capitale sociale. Istituto Poligrafico nel 2005 al MIBtel corrente genera un reddito, che, attraverso la somma ai depositi. Maggiore entita. Lavoro transfrontaliero

By: Scott Lykins

Scott Lykins — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:34:48 +0000

WHAT THE F***, never incorporate religon OR politics for this can ruin a game and a players mood,my gorup is quick whipped with knowing that anything can happen, D&D just is a sterotyped tabletop, thats why it seems so commy which in a sense maybe it is, still none the less, stay focused on your game and the playeres not the BS that comes with it!
Vencorbin@live.com

By: Why Timmy Can Only Stab Once A Day « Jonathan Drain’s D20 Source: Dungeons & Dragons Blog

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:02:14 +0000

[...] may have mentioned my fourth edition players before. Four sessions in, the players are learning more about the game rules but still have [...]

By: The International House of Bacon » Blog Archive » Link Dump

The International House of Bacon » Blog Archive » Link Dump — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:01:46 +0000

[...] Some fun: Left 4 Dead valentines, the Austin zombie warnings, evidence that D&D is Communist, Karaoke [...]

By: Crafty_Alex

Crafty_Alex — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:44:37 +0000

Very clever. I would think Anarchism would describe most D&D (or gaming) groups…but don’t forget some others:

Theocracy: The GM is God, and the NPCs are His divine servants. If players dispute the GM’s dictates, they will be ganged up on by all NPCs until they bend to their will or die.

Meritocracy: Players take from the loot as their skill and experience warrant. Each XP and gold piece is carefully accounted against points of damage dealt, player enjoyment, and many other qualitative and quantitative measures. If one player becomes dominant enough, he becomes the GM.

Marxism: Game materials are placed in a pot at the beginning of each session, and redistributed to all players equally, regardless of who bought them. There’s no GM – everyone just plays their role of their own accord.

By: Swordgleam

Swordgleam — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:38:47 +0000

My current group definitely resembles the late Roman Republic – they all nominally have equal power, and spend the majority of their time on back-room deals to convince one another that they should stand together on a certain issue, only to turn around and do whatever most benefits them. In times of dire crisis, they will work together for the benefit of the group, and then each of them will try to claim the glory for their success. If one of them supports another one, it’s because he expects to get something in return.

By: Bonemaster

Bonemaster — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:51:05 +0000

I think I’ve played in a Monarchy, Neoconservativism, and Feudalism games before. No really. BTW, I loved this post.

By: Mad Brew

Mad Brew — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:48:42 +0000

Ooh, you beat me to it. As a follow up to my “What if RPGs were Religions” I was going to work in Politics.

My group must be Fascists, we promote an authoritarian gamist ideology that encourages violent conflict with other players and/or gaming groups that do not share our views. Should a GM not agree with us, we quickly execute a coup.